ICTR in the News: Surgeons Transform Static ‘Mona Lisa’ Smiles to Joyous Ones
Posted by: Crystal Williams on: March 28, 2018 | Print This Page
The following article profiles work performed in part by ICTR researchers Lisa Ishii, and Patrick Byrne of Johns Hopkins.
“The smile has been judged as the most important sign to express positive emotions, and people are judged to be angry when they can’t smile,” says Kofi Boahene, M.D., associate professor of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery and dermatology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “Previously, the best we could hope for most of the time with surgery was a smirk where just the corners of the mouth upturn in a smile like the one Mona Lisa has in DaVinci’s famous painting. But that isn’t a joyful, expressive smile where the lips move up, teeth show and eyes narrow. Now we’re able to really restore a true smile.”
Standard surgical fixes for people with one-sided facial paralysis transplanted muscle tissue from a person’s thigh that pulled up on the paralyzed side of the mouth. The modified procedure uses gracilis muscles from the thigh placed in two directions and sometimes three placed at the corner of the mouth or the upper lip to the cheek and eyelid to recreate an authentic smile that shows teeth and gum on both sides of the face.
The surgeons published their findings on 12 adult patients, along with measurements of improvement, online March 22 in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.
Prior to surgery, the physicians videoed and measured the type, angle and degree of smile on the nonparalyzed side of the patients’ faces. During surgery, they positioned the new muscles so that they pulled the lips up to match the nonparalyzed half-smile when contracted. Then they rerouted blood vessels and one or more types of nerves to the transplanted tissue from the nonparalyzed side of the face.
The idea was that when the nerves on the nonparalyzed side send a signal for the muscle to contract, forming a smile, they do so for the paralyzed side of the face, too, Boahene said.
By four months after the procedure, all participants had function in the transplanted muscle.
On average, each person showed an extra three teeth when smiling on the newly functional side of their face. The amount of gum exposed during smiling increased from an average of 31.5 millimeters before surgery to 43.7 millimeters after surgery. Wrinkling around the eyes when smiling was observed in four of the 12 people after surgery. The surgeons also said asymmetry, or differences between the corners of each side of the mouth, was reduced from an average of 9.1 millimeters to 4.5 millimeters after surgery in the patients, making their smiles more even.
According to Boahene, some people come to see him early on after their paralysis, and others come to him after they have exhausted all options such as rehabilitation. “For me, joy is to see a child who has never smiled or someone who has lost their smile to paralysis be able to smile; you just see people transform,” says Boahene. “In the past, we were restoring fake smiles and now our patients’ new smiles are so contagious that you can’t help but smile back.”
As a functional, reconstructive surgery, the procedure is usually covered by insurance. But in the case that it isn’t covered the procedure would cost around that of a new single family home.
Most people with facial paralysis, in spite of how long they have been paralyzed, are candidates for this procedure. Patients with a weak gracilis muscle can have alternative muscles used instead.
None of the patients in this study had any complications, but there is the potential for swelling and fluid collecting at the site where the muscle was removed. Also, some patients may need minor adjustments in the muscle tension to optimize their smile and symmetry.
Additional authors on the study include Lisa Ishii, Masaru Ishii, Shaun Desai and Patrick Byrne of Johns Hopkins; James Owusu of Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group; Irene Kim of University of California Los Angeles and Leslie Kim of Ohio State University.
The authors don’t have any funding or conflicts of interest to report for this study.
For the Media